ABSTRACT
Background@#The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the biomechanical characteristics of a new locking loop stitch (LLS), developed utilizing the concepts of both running locking stitch and needleless stitch, to the traditional Krackow stitch. @*Methods@#The Krackow stitch with No.2 braided suture and the LLS with 1.3-mm augmented polyblend suture tape were compared biomechanically. The LLS was performed with single strand locking loops and wrapping suture around the tendon, resulting in half the needle penetrations through the graft compared to the Krackow stitch. Twenty bovine extensor tendons were divided randomly into two groups. The tendons were prepared to match equal thickness and cross-sectional area. Each suture-tendon was stitched and preloaded to 5 N for 60 seconds, cyclically loaded to 20 N, 40 N, and 60 N for 10 cycles each, and then loaded to failure. The deformation of the suture-tendon construct, stiffness, yield load, and ultimate load were measured. @*Results@#The LLS had significantly less deformation of the suture-tendon construct at 100 N, 200 N, 300 N, and at ultimate load compared to the Krackow stitch (Krackow stitch and LLS at 100 N: 1.3 ± 0.1 mm and 1.0 ± 0.2 mm, p < 0.001; 200 N: 3.0 ± 0.3 mm and 1.9 ± 0.2 mm, p < 0.001; 300 N: 5.1 ± 0.6 mm and 2.9 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.001; ultimate load: 12.8 ± 2.8 mm and 5.0 ± 1.2 mm, p < 0.001).The LLS had significantly greater stiffness (Krackow stitch and LLS: 97.5 ± 6.9 N/mm and 117.2 ± 13.9 N/mm, p < 0.001) and yield load (Krackow stitch and LLS: 66.2 ± 15.9 N and 237.9 ± 93.6 N, p < 0.001) compared to the Krackow stitch. There was no significant difference in ultimate load (Krackow stitch: 450.2 ± 49.4 N; LLS: 472.6 ± 59.8 N; p = 0.290). @*Conclusions@#The LLS had significantly smaller deformation of the suture-tendon construct compared to the Krackow stitch. The LLS may be a viable surgical alternative to the Krackow stitch for graft fixation when secure fixation is necessary.
ABSTRACT
Background@#Muscular forces drive proximal humeral fracture deformity, yet it is unknown if arm position can help mitigate such forces. Our hypothesis was that glenohumeral abduction and humeral internal rotation decrease the pull of the supraspinatus and subscapularis muscles, minimizing varus fracture deformity. @*Methods@#A medial wedge osteotomy was performed in eight cadaveric shoulders to simulate a two-part fracture. The specimens were tested on a custom shoulder testing system. Humeral head varus was measured following physiologic muscle loading at neutral and 20° humeral internal rotation at both 0° and 20° glenohumeral abduction. @*Results@#There was a significant decrease in varus deformity caused by the subscapularis (p<0.05) at 20° abduction. Significantly increasing humeral internal rotation decreased varus deformity caused by the subscapularis (p<0.05) at both abduction angles and that caused by the supraspinatus (p<0.05) and infraspinatus (p<0.05) at 0° abduction only. @*Conclusions@#Postoperative shoulder abduction and internal rotation can be protective against varus failure following proximal humeral fracture fixation as these positions decrease tension on the supraspinatus and subscapularis muscles. Use of a resting sling that places the shoulder in this position should be considered.
ABSTRACT
Residual knee instability and low rates of return to previous sport are major concerns after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To improve outcomes, surgical methods, such as the anatomical single-bundle technique or the double-bundle technique, were developed. However, these reconstruction techniques failed to adequately overcome these problems, and, therefore, new potential answers continue to be of great interest. Based on recent anatomical and biomechanical studies emphasizing the role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in rotational stability, novel surgical methods including ALL reconstruction and anterolateral tenodesis have been introduced with the possibility of resolving residual instability after ACL reconstruction. However, there is still little consensus on many aspects of the ALL, including: several anatomical issues, appropriate indications for ALL surgery, and the optimal surgical method and graft choice for reconstruction surgery. Therefore, further studies are necessary to advance our knowledge of the ALL and its contribution to knee stability.